On Monday I received the High Holiday Survey percentages and on Tuesday I received the comments. I read every one of them. First let me say I’m glad this was done anonymously because it enabled people to be brutally honest in their comments. Second, I gleaned some key takeaways, including that people want sermons which are relevant to the events of our day. Hence this week’s remarks on the New York City mayoral election. Of course, the danger of that is it enters politics which means a number of you will disagree with my remarks and ask Dan to remind me that we are a synagogue with diverse political positions. It’s a no-win for a rabbi, yet this particular issue is worth a sermon.

          I signed the rabbinic letter against Zohran Mamdani for the simple reason that I don’t believe that anti-Zionism should have a place in American politics. With that being said, I was not surprised that Mamdani won election. Many people on my Facebook feed, including rabbis and Jewish educators, wrote that they voted for him and are excited about his leadership. Primary reasons were his platform to make NYC more affordable, lowering grocery prices, taxing millionaires and corporations, offering free childcare and bussing, rent freezes and raising the minimum wage. These people indicate their belief that Mamdani will follow through on his campaign promises.

          Of lesser importance to these Jewish individuals was Mamdani’s anti-Zionism. I saw comments that as mayor he will only deal with domestic issues. Many of these people are also vocally critical of the Israeli government. I don’t think they’d mind if Mamdani arrested Bibi Netanyahu the next time he visits NYC-if he even has the power to do so. The area in which I differ with them is I see Mamdani’s anti-Zionism, his use of the phrase “globalize the intifada,” his comparing NYPD boots on people’s necks as being “laced by the IDF” and other hateful rhetoric as being deeply problematic. I don’t dismiss them as simply tweets after George Floyd’s murder as Mamdani did in his 2^nd mayoral debate. Further troubling is Mamdani will not endorse Israel as a Jewish state, as he claims he would not do for any other country that favors one group of people over another. He also has said he may displace the Cornell Tech campus, a joint venture between Cornell University and the Technion Institute.

          There is much to be disturbed about regarding Mamdani. Yet I want to raise the question as to what do we do about it? Rabbi Wolpe, when speaking as our scholar in residence, said that if elected, Jewish New Yorkers should work with Mamdani on bettering the city. It is this point that I want to make and relate to our situation in Sacramento. Like Rabbi Wolpe, I signed the rabbinic letter “expressing concern over the normalization of anti-Zionism and its implications for the Jewish community” and urging people not to vote for Mamdani or anti-Zionist candidates. At the same time, I cannot help but wonder about the other legs of Mamdani’s platform that appealed to so many of my contemporaries in NYC. If we only decry Mamdani’s anti-Zionism and perhaps antisemitism without grappling with the domestic aspects of his agenda, I believe we are being obtuse and missing the mark.

          I’ll give you an example in Sacramento. A year and a half ago, many of us, including me, went to City Council to protest Mayor Steinberg’s Gaza ceasefire resolution. We were up in arms against what I continue to believe was a flawed resolution. Since the resolution passed, I have yet to make it to another City Council meeting. What message have I sent by not going back? We need to build relationships with people rather than just railing against them when they don’t do what we want. I’m happy that at least I have met with a number of councilmembers, including Mayor McCarty, yet Mamdani’s victory was a wakeup call to me that I need to do a better job of meeting with political leaders in advance of any problems, and see if I can support them in what they want in addition to asking for what I want.

          How do we relate this to the watershed moment of Mamdani’s victory? Some have been inviting people to move to their communities from NYC, including a couple of my rabbinic colleagues. Frankly, I find that distasteful, just as I found it distasteful when Prime Minister Netanyahu said people in Paris should move to Israel after an antisemitic attack. I don’t believe we can live in fear, catastrophizing the worst-case scenarios and claiming that the sky is falling. Because our people have survived for so long, we often have anticipatory stress. Don’t get me wrong-there is plenty of danger with Mamdani becoming mayor. Yet to fear that NYC, the city with the most Jews in the world, will collapse overnight, is preposterous. I’m not saying damage won’t be done. Maybe Mamdani will succeed but maybe he will fail. In either event, we cannot give up hope that New York Jews will be safe nor can we stop trying to build bridges if there’s a willingness to do so from the other side-of course with eyes wide open.

          I’m urging us to be hazak v’ematz, strong and courageous. There are many Jews who are not all anti-Zionist or “self-haters” who proudly voted for Mamdani. Perhaps there is a certain degree of naivete-I certainly think so. Yet to preach doomsday at this point is not only premature but also out of proportion. There might G-d forbid come a time when that is the reality; I pray that time does not come and that Mayor Mamdani does what we says he will in ensuring the safety and security of the 1 million Jews he will govern at the turn of the year.